[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546BBAE2.306@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:32:18 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Konstantin Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Chernenkov <dmitryc@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <adech.fo@...il.com>,
Yuri Gribov <tetra2005@...il.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] Kernel address sanitizer - runtime memory debugger.
On 11/18/2014 01:15 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> > If kasan will permit us to remove kmemcheck/debug_pagealloc/slub_debug
>> > then that tips the balance a little. What's the feasibility of that?
> Maybe removing kmemcheck. slub_debug/debug_pagealloc are simple, and are in
> different niches (lower overhead debugging)
Yeah, slub_debug can be turned on at runtime in production kernels so
it's in a completely different category.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists