linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: pcc: Enable autoload of pcc-cpufreq for ACPI processors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2494503.pmLurATttt@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:30:32 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Joseph.Szczypek@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: pcc: Enable autoload of pcc-cpufreq for ACPI processors

On Thursday, November 13, 2014 01:51:52 PM Lenny Szubowicz wrote:
> The pcc-cpufreq driver is not automatically loaded on systems where
> the platform's power management setting requires this driver.
> Instead, on those systems no CPU frequency driver is registered and
> active.
> 
> Make the autoloading matching criteria for loading the pcc-cpufreq
> driver the same as done in acpi-cpufreq by commit c655affbd524d01
> ("ACPI / cpufreq: Add ACPI processor device IDs to acpi-cpufreq").
> 
> x86 CPU frequency drivers are now typically autoloaded by specifying
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE entries and x86cpu model specific matching.
> But pcc-cpufreq was omitted when acpi-cpufreq and other drivers were
> changed to use this approach.
> 
> Both acpi-cpufreq and pcc-cpufreq depend on a distinct and mutually
> exclusive set of ACPI methods which are not directly tied to specific
> processor model numbers. Both of these drivers have init routines
> which look for their required ACPI methods. As a result, only the
> appropriate driver registers as the cpu frequency driver and the other
> one ends up being unloaded.
> 
> Tested on various systems where acpi-cpufreq, intel_pstate, and
> pcc-cpufreq are the expected cpu frequency drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Szczypek <joseph.szczypek@...com>
> Reported-by: Trinh Dao <trinh.dao@...com>

Queued up for 3.19-rc1, thanks!

> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> index 4d2c8e8..2a0d589 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> @@ -603,6 +603,13 @@ static void __exit pcc_cpufreq_exit(void)
>  	free_percpu(pcc_cpu_info);
>  }
>  
> +static const struct acpi_device_id processor_device_ids[] = {
> +	{ACPI_PROCESSOR_OBJECT_HID, },
> +	{ACPI_PROCESSOR_DEVICE_HID, },
> +	{},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, processor_device_ids);
> +
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Matthew Garrett, Naga Chumbalkar");
>  MODULE_VERSION(PCC_VERSION);
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Processor Clocking Control interface driver");
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/