[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141118074422.GA17829@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:44:22 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Ionut Alexa <ionut.m.alexa@...il.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] exit: silence a bogus static checker warning
Smatch complains about this:
kernel/exit.c:543 forget_original_parent()
warn: add some parenthesis here?
I don't normally advocate changing the code to make the static checker
happy but these are normally precedence bugs so I think it's ok to put
parenthesis so it's clear the code is deliberate.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 6192422..1192d12 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struct task_struct *father)
list_for_each_entry(p, &father->children, sibling) {
for_each_thread(p, t) {
t->real_parent = reaper;
- BUG_ON(!t->ptrace != (t->parent == father));
+ BUG_ON((!t->ptrace) != (t->parent == father));
if (likely(!t->ptrace))
t->parent = t->real_parent;
if (t->pdeath_signal)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists