[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1416300621.30131.6.camel@mm-sol.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:50:21 +0200
From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <Bjorn.Andersson@...ymobile.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...pv.it>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] pinctrl: pinconf-generic: Allow driver to specify
DT params
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 15:53 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Soren Brinkmann
> brinkmann@...inx.com> wrote:
>
> > Additionally to the generic DT parameters, allow drivers to provide
> > driver-specific DT parameters to be used with the generic parser
> > infrastructure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann brinkmann@...inx.com>
>
> I like the looks of this, but the patch description is a bit terse.
> I'd like it to describe some of the refactorings being done
> to the intrinsics, because I have a hard time following the patch.
>
> First please rebase onto the "devel" branch in the pin control
> tree, and notice that drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> which is merged there is actually doing this already:
>
>
> for_each_child_of_node(np_config, np) {
> ret = pinconf_generic_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, map,
> &reserv, nmaps, type);
> if (ret)
> break;
>
> ret = pmic_gpio_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, map, &reserv,
> nmaps, type);
> if (ret)
> break;
> }
>
> So it should be patched to illustrate the point of this code.
>
I like the idea, but have issues with implementations :-).
It is supposed that additional parameters are not generic,
otherwise they will be part of enum pin_config_param, right?
Probably it will be better if clients could pass array with
driver specific dt bindings to pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map()?
Regards,
Ivan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists