linux-kernel - Re: Re: [RFC] perf-cache command interface design

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <546B2035.2060402@hitachi.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:32:21 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Hemant Kumar <hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, oleg@...hat.com,
	hegdevasant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	systemtap@...rceware.org, aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	penberg@....fi, brendan.d.gregg@...il.com,
	"yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] perf-cache command interface design

(2014/11/18 13:41), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Masami,
> 
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:17:31 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/11/17 12:08), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> I prefer this too.  But I'd like make the 'add' part a subcommand rather
>>> than option like we do in perf kmem/kvm/list/lock/mem/sched ...  And it
>>> can handle multiple files at once.  What about this?
>>>
>>>   perf cache add [--elf|--sdt|--probe <spec>] <binary> [<binary>...]
>>
>> OK, that's good to me. And I think --elf/--sdt is meaningless.
> 
> Maybe not :)
> 
> I'm considering the opposite side - by providing the options, we also
> support the negative ones too.  So --no-elf and/or --no-sdt options are
> possible.  Also the positive options can be used with del(ete)
> subcommand to remove some contents selectively.
> 
> I think it'd be helpful as we sometimes don't want to do that for some
> reason.  For example, current perf record adds binary (elf) files to the
> cache automatically iff it's accessed.  But what about SDTs?  Should we
> add SDTs at the same time?  If not, what if we try to add existing elf
> files only for SDTs?

Ah, I see. Indeed, in this case we'd better have perf cache add --sdt <bin>
for explicitly adding SDTs. (Of course perf cache add <bin> can also
add SDTs automagically, but adding --sdt is more natural)

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/