[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141118003305.GB11280@saruman>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:33:05 -0600
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
CC: <balbi@...com>, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 09/12] usb: xhci: Add NVIDIA Tegra xHCI
host-controller driver
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 03:51:29PM -0800, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> >> +static const struct {
> >> + const char *name;
> >> + unsigned int num;
> >> +} tegra_xhci_phy_types[] = {
> >> + {
> >> + .name = "usb3",
> >> + .num = TEGRA_XUSB_USB3_PHYS,
> >> + }, {
> >> + .name = "utmi",
> >> + .num = TEGRA_XUSB_UTMI_PHYS,
> >> + }, {
> >> + .name = "hsic",
> >> + .num = TEGRA_XUSB_HSIC_PHYS,
> >> + },
> >
> > these should be using the generic PHY subsystem (drivers/phy).
>
> This driver does use the generic PHY subsystem, see patch 7 in this series :).
true, I got misled by the fact that you added your phy provider to your
pinctrl. Odd.
> >> +static int tegra_xhci_load_firmware(struct tegra_xhci_hcd *tegra)
> >> +{
> >> + struct device *dev = tegra->dev;
> >> + struct tegra_xhci_fw_cfgtbl *cfg_tbl;
> >> + struct tm fw_tm;
> >> + u32 val, code_tag_blocks, code_size_blocks;
> >> + u64 fw_base;
> >> + time_t fw_time;
> >> + unsigned long timeout;
> >> +
> >> + if (csb_readl(tegra, XUSB_CSB_MP_ILOAD_BASE_LO) != 0) {
> >> + dev_info(dev, "Firmware already loaded, Falcon state 0x%x\n",
> >> + csb_readl(tegra, XUSB_FALC_CPUCTL));
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
> >
> > won't this prevent rmmod && insmod from succeeding ? Maybe not, as you
> > return 0 anyway, but if the firmware side craps out, it might be useful
> > to reload the firmware and reset that block. I wonder if this prevents
> > that.
>
> rmmod && insmod does work with the above since, as you mentioned, we
> return successfully if the controller is already running. Attempting
> to re-load the firmware if the controller is already running won't
> work - it requires a full power-gate/ungate sequence of the
> controller. Unfortunately, that sequence is rather complicated and I
> haven't had a chance to implement it yet. it will hopefully be coming
> later, though.
Alright, could you add a comment on the source code stating that ?
Perhaps a REVISIT note or FIXME ?
cheers
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists