[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iHVWuiTfc4n8LeYkYhmMXA76kEs3xcH1WbrAr468MFe2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:50:19 +0530
From: Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>,
Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, kishon <kishon@...com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...gle.com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] usb: host: xhci-plat: Get PHYs for xhci's hcds
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 11/17/2014 9:36 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>
>>>> The host controller by itself may sometimes need to handle PHY
>>>> and re-initialize it to re-configure some of the PHY parameters
>>>> to get full support out of the PHY controller.
>>>> Therefore, facilitate getting the two possible PHYs, viz.
>>>> USB 2.0 type (UTMI+) and USB 3.0 type (PIPE3), and initialize them.
>
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c | 74
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>
>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
>>>> index 3d78b0c..5207d5b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
>
> [...]
>>>>
>>>> @@ -204,6 +271,8 @@ static int xhci_plat_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>> struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>> struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
>>>>
>>>> + phy_exit(hcd->phy);
>
>
>>> Hm, in the suspend() method?
>
>
>> phy_exit() should eventually be suspending the PHY and put it to
>> low power state.
>
>
> I thought it's a role that the power_off() mothod should play,
> considering that the power_on() method gets called after the init()
> method....
phy_power_off() should be cutting the clocks and power from PHY
completely, no ?
In that case one may not be able to wakeup the system from USB.
So phy_exit() gets the responsibility to put the PHY into low power state.
Ccing Kishon also to get his opinion on actual role of the two callbacks -
phy_init/exit() and phy_power_on/off().
>
>> phy_init() in resume() will then take up the task of activating the
>> PHY again.
>
>
>> phy_power_on() and phy_power_off() are called at xhci_probe() and remove()
>> time.
>
>
> Of course.
>
>> Does this makes sense ?
>
>
> Not much, really.
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
--
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore
India
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists