[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1411181518310.3909@nanos>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:19:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Yun Wu (Abel)" <wuyun.wu@...wei.com>
cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 08/16] genirq: Introduce callback
irq_chip.irq_write_msi_msg
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Yun Wu (Abel) wrote:
> On 2014/11/18 21:43, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > We provide an irq_chip for each type of interrupt controller
> > instead of devices. For the example mentioned above, if device A
> > and Group B has different interrupt controllers, we just need to
> > implement irq_chip_A and irq_chip_B and set irq_chip.irq_write_msi_msg()
> > to suitable callbacks.
> > The framework already achieves what you you want:)
>
> What if device A and group B have the same interrupt controller?
Well, if write_msg() is different they are hardly the same.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists