[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141118142354.GH12037@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:23:54 +0000
From: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu@...au.co.uk>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"huxinwei@...wei.com" <huxinwei@...wei.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wuyun <wuyun.wu@...wei.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing0307@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/16] PCI: Enhance pci_scan_root_bus() to support
default IO/MEM resources
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:46:06AM +0000, Yijing Wang wrote:
> On 2014/11/18 17:36, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 November 2014 15:44:23 Yijing Wang wrote:
> >> On 2014/11/17 18:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> On Monday 17 November 2014 18:21:35 Yijing Wang wrote:
> >>>> - list_for_each_entry(window, resources, list)
> >>>> - if (window->res->flags & IORESOURCE_BUS) {
> >>>> - found = true;
> >>>> - break;
> >>>> - }
> >>>> + if (!resources) {
> >>>> + pci_add_resource(&default_res, &ioport_resource);
> >>>> + pci_add_resource(&default_res, &iomem_resource);
> >>>> + pci_add_resource(&default_res, &busn_resource);
> >>>> + } else {
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Isn't it almost always wrong to do this? You are adding all of the
> >>> I/O ports and memory to the host bridge, which will prevent you from
> >>> adding another host bridge, and the iomem_resource normally
> >>> includes a lot of addresses that are not accessible by the PCI host.
> >>
> >> Hi Arnd, pci host bridge windows are the ranges allow child devices to setup
> >> from. Add all of IO/MEM here just a limit to child devices, no request for these
> >> resources, so it won't hurt another host bridge. Some platforms have no dts or ACPI
> >> report host bridge resources, in this case, we directly assign ioport/iomem_resources
> >> as the root resources of PCI devices.
> >
> > But it would be wrong to allow hosts to allocate a device BAR that is not
> > visible through the host bridge. I think we need to keep these separate
> > from the general case: if you call any of the modern interfaces you have
> > to provide the resources and a device. I notice that there is only one
> > caller of pci_scan_bus_parented(), we should probably change that over to
> > pci_scan_root_bus() or your new interface and remove the old one, but
> > keep pci_scan_bus() as the only entry point for all of the legacy users
> > that do not know about the resources.
>
> Ok, I will move this out of the generic interface.
My suggestion would actually be to trigger a warning/error if you detect that the resources
are missing. That way we can force the drivers to clean up.
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> Thanks!
> Yijing.
>
> >
> > Arnd
> >
> > .
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
> Yijing
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists