[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141118161259.GC5238@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:12:59 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86, entry: Switch stacks on a paranoid entry from
userspace
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:05:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/log/?h=x86/paranoid
>
> I'm not quite ready to send v3. I want to do two things first:
>
> 1. Consider disabling the stack switch for double_fault.
Sounds conservatively nice :)
> 2. Clean up the macros. I'll validate this by ensuring that the
> generated code is identical to the current version.
>
> IOW, I don't expect the asm for machine_check to change.
Right, so I don't see anything wrong with the patch but entry_64.S is
nasty so don't take my word for it.
I guess handlers should need to do "if (user_mode_vm(regs))" after your
change now, in order to know what to do.
I'll try to do some error injection here too, on my boxes to see how
this behaves.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists