[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546B7B8D.1070201@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:02:05 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>
CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"hanjun.guo@...aro.org" <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"jcm@...hat.com" <jcm@...hat.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
"Kangkang.Shen@...wei.com" <Kangkang.Shen@...wei.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/18] ARM64: Move the init of cpu_logical_map(0) before
unflatten_device_tree()
Hi Will,
I was writing to reply to Catalin's mail :)
On 18/11/14 16:57, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 04:43:13PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:45:49PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> On 2014年10月17日 21:36, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>> It always make sense to initialize CPU0's logical map entry from the
>>>> hardware values, so move the initialization of cpu_logical_map(0)
>>>> before unflatten_device_tree() which is needed by ACPI code later.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
>>>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> Could you merge this patch first in 3.19? It was acked by Olof and
>>> Mark, and it will make sense without ACPI too.
>>
>> I think it can go in for 3.19 (it's Will's turn this time ;)).
>
> This patch doesn't apply on for-next/core, as it conflicts with some of
> Rutland's rework ("arm64: log physical ID of boot CPU").
>
It's actually not required anymore, as "arm64: log physical ID of boot
CPU" move it quite early in the sequence from setup_arch to
smp_setup_processor_id while this patch just moves it up in setup_arch.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists