linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] ARM: option for loading modules into vmalloc area

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141118173413.GB4042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:34:13 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <k.khlebnikov@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ARM: option for loading modules into vmalloc area

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 08:21:46PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Usually modules are loaded into small area prior to the kernel
> text because they are linked with the kernel using short calls.
> Compile-time instrumentation like GCOV or KASAN bloats code a lot,
> and as a result huge modules no longer fit into reserved area.
> 
> This patch adds option CONFIG_MODULES_USE_VMALLOC which lifts
> limitation on amount of loaded modules. It links modules using
> long-calls (option -mlong-calls) and loads them into vmalloc area.
> 
> In few places exported symbols are called from inline assembly.
> This patch adds macro for such call sites: __asmbl and __asmbl_clobber.
> Call turns into single 'bl' or sequence 'movw; movt; blx' depending on
> context and state of config option.
> 
> Unfortunately this option isn't compatible with CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER.
> Compiler emits short calls to profiling function despite of -mlong-calls.
> This is a bug in GCC, but ftrace anyway needs an update to handle this.

It also isn't compatible with the older architectures which don't have
"blx".

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index 9d2cdda..9e0c4f4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1161,16 +1161,15 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
>  
>  static inline void prepare_page_table(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned long addr;
> +	unsigned long addr = 0;
>  	phys_addr_t end;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Clear out all the mappings below the kernel image.
>  	 */
> -	for (addr = 0; addr < MODULES_VADDR; addr += PMD_SIZE)
> -		pmd_clear(pmd_off_k(addr));
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
> +	for ( ; addr < MODULES_VADDR; addr += PMD_SIZE)
> +		pmd_clear(pmd_off_k(addr));
>  	/* The XIP kernel is mapped in the module area -- skip over it */
>  	addr = ((unsigned long)_etext + PMD_SIZE - 1) & PMD_MASK;
>  #endif

This seems to be an unrelated change.  In any case, it looks wrong to
me.  Please describe what you are trying to achieve here.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/