Message-ID: <546C310D.5040702@rock-chips.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:56:29 +0800
From:	addy ke <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>
To:	jh80.chung@...sung.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
	galak@...eaurora.org, rdunlap@...radead.org, tgih.jun@...sung.com,
	chris@...ntf.net, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, dinguyen@...era.com,
	heiko@...ech.de, olof@...om.net, dianders@...omium.org,
	sonnyrao@...omium.org, amstan@...omium.org
CC:	huangtao@...k-chips.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	hl@...k-chips.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, yzq@...k-chips.com,
	zyw@...k-chips.com, zhangqing@...k-chips.com,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kever.yang@...k-chips.com, lintao@...k-chips.com,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, xjq@...k-chips.com,
	zhenfu.fang@...k-chips.com, chenfen@...k-chips.com,
	cf@...k-chips.com, hj@...k-chips.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, zyf@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: add quirk for data over interrupt timeout

Hi Jaehoon

On 2014/11/19 09:22, Jaehoon Chung Wrote:
> Hi, Addy.
> 
> On 11/18/2014 09:32 AM, Addy wrote:
>>
>> On 2014年11月14日 21:18, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>>> Hi, Addy.
>>>
>>> Did you use the DW_MCI_QUIRK_IDMAC_DTO?
>>> I'm not sure, but i wonder if you get what result when you use above quirk.
>>
>> DW_MCI_QUIRK_IDMAC_DTO is only for version2.0 or below.
>>         /*
>>          * DTO fix - version 2.10a and below, and only if internal DMA
>>          * is configured.
>>          */
>>         if (host->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_IDMAC_DTO) {
>>                 if (!pending &&
>>                     ((mci_readl(host, STATUS) >> 17) & 0x1fff))
>>                         pending |= SDMMC_INT_DATA_OVER;
>>         }
>>
>> It meams that if interrupt comes, but pending = 0 && FIFO_COUNT(bit17-29) !=0,
>> then force to set SDMMC_INT_DATA_OVER.
>> But in our case, FIFO_COUNT = 0 (STATUS register value is 0xad06). This is
>> because that the card does not send data to host. So there is no interrupts come,
>> and interrupt handle function(dw_mci_interrupt) will not be called. So we need a
>> timer to handle this case.
>>
>> So I think  SDMMC_INT_DATA_OVER is not suitable for this case, and we need a new
>> quirk.
>>
>>>
>>> And i will check more this patch at next week.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your efforts.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Jaehoon Chung
>>>
>>> On 11/14/2014 10:05 PM, Addy Ke wrote:
>>>> From: Addy <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>
>>>>
>>>> This patch add a new quirk to notify the driver to teminate
>>>> current transfer and report a data timeout to the core,
>>>> if data over interrupt does NOT come within the given time.
>>>>
>>>> dw_mmc call mmc_request_done func to finish transfer depends on
>>>> data over interrupt. If data over interrupt does not come in
>>>> sending data state, the current transfer will be blocked.
>>>>
>>>> But this case really exists, when driver reads tuning data from
>>>> card on rk3288-pink2 board. I measured waveforms by oscilloscope
>>>> and found that card clock was always on and data lines were always
>>>> holded high level in sending data state. This is the cause that
>>>> card does NOT send data to host.
>>>>
>>>> According to synopsys designware databook, the timeout counter is
>>>> started only after the card clock is stopped.
>>>>
>>>> So if card clock is always on, data read timeout interrupt will NOT come,
>>>> and if data lines are always holded high level, all data-related
>>>> interrupt such as start-bit error, data crc error, data over interrupt,
>>>> end-bit error, and so on, will NOT come too.
>>>>
>>>> So driver can't get the current state, it can do nothing but wait for.
>>>>
>>>> This patch is based on https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5227941/
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Addy <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c  | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>   include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h |  5 +++++
>>>>   2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>>> index b4c3044..3960fc3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>>> @@ -1448,6 +1448,17 @@ static int dw_mci_data_complete(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_data *data)
>>>>       return data->error;
>>>>   }
>>>>   +static inline void dw_mci_dto_start_monitor(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    unsigned int data_tmout_clks;
>>>> +    unsigned int data_tmout_ms;
>>>> +
>>>> +    data_tmout_clks = (mci_readl(host, TMOUT) >> 8);
>>>> +    data_tmout_ms = (data_tmout_clks * 1000 / host->bus_hz) + 250;
> 
> What's 250? And how about using the DIV_ROUND_UP? 
> 
250ms is only for more timeout.
maybe data timeout read from TMOUT register is enough.
So, I will remove 250.
new code:
data_tmout_clks = (mci_readl(host, TMOUT) >> 8);
data_tmout_ms = DIV_ROUND_UP(data_tmout_clks * 100, host->bus_hz);
Is right?

>>>> +
>>>> +    mod_timer(&host->dto_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(data_tmout_ms));
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>   static void dw_mci_tasklet_func(unsigned long priv)
>>>>   {
>>>>       struct dw_mci *host = (struct dw_mci *)priv;
>>>> @@ -1522,8 +1533,11 @@ static void dw_mci_tasklet_func(unsigned long priv)
>>>>               }
>>>>                 if (!test_and_clear_bit(EVENT_XFER_COMPLETE,
>>>> -                        &host->pending_events))
>>>> +                        &host->pending_events)) {
>>>> +                if (host->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_DTO_TIMER)
>>>> +                    dw_mci_dto_start_monitor(host);
> 
> if timer is starting at only here, dw_mci_dto_start_monitor() doesn't need.
> 
Ok, I will change it in the next patch.
>>>>                   break;
>>>> +            }
>>>>                 set_bit(EVENT_XFER_COMPLETE, &host->completed_events);
>>>>   @@ -2115,6 +2129,9 @@ static irqreturn_t dw_mci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>>>           }
>>>>             if (pending & SDMMC_INT_DATA_OVER) {
>>>> +            if (host->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_DTO_TIMER)
>>>> +                del_timer(&host->dto_timer);
>>>> +
>>>>               mci_writel(host, RINTSTS, SDMMC_INT_DATA_OVER);
>>>>               if (!host->data_status)
>>>>                   host->data_status = pending;
>>>> @@ -2502,6 +2519,28 @@ ciu_out:
>>>>       return ret;
>>>>   }
>>>>   +static void dw_mci_dto_timer(unsigned long arg)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct dw_mci *host = (struct dw_mci *)arg;
> 
> I prefer to use the "data" instead of "arg"
> 
Ok, I will change it in the next patch.
>>>> +
>>>> +    switch (host->state) {
>>>> +    case STATE_SENDING_DATA:
>>>> +    case STATE_DATA_BUSY:
>>>> +        /*
>>>> +        * If data over interrupt does NOT come in sending data state,
>>>> +        * we should notify the driver to teminate current transfer
> teminate/terminate?
> 
Am, I will change it in the next patch.
>>>> +        * and report a data timeout to the core.
>>>> +        */
>>>> +        host->data_status = SDMMC_INT_DRTO;
>>>> +        set_bit(EVENT_DATA_ERROR, &host->pending_events);
>>>> +        set_bit(EVENT_DATA_COMPLETE, &host->pending_events);
> 
> Dose it need to set EVENT_DATA_COMPLETE?
> 
Yes, it is nessarry!
If not, dw_mci_data_complete function will not be called in my test.
Analysis as follows:
After host recevied command response, driver call tasklet_schedule to
set EVENT_CMD_COMPLETE, change state to STATE_SENDING_DATA, and call
mod_timer. Because there is no any interrupts come in this case,
tasklet_schedule function will not be called until dw_mci_timer is called.

dw_mci_timer-->
tasklet_schedule-->
dw_mci_tasklet_func-->
state == STATE_SENDING_DATA  and EVENT_DATA_ERROR-->
dw_mci_stop_dma, set EVENT_XFER_COMPLETE, send_stop_abort, state = STATE_DATA_ERROR, and then break;-->
check state again -->
state == STATE_DATA_ERROR, if it NOT set EVENT_DATA_COMPLETE in dw_mci_timer goto 1), else goto 2) -->


1) in case STATE_DATA_BUSY, there does nothing but break, and dw_mci_data_complete and dw_mci_request_end
   will not be called. then mmc blocks.

2) in case STATE_DATA_BUSY, becase EVENT_DATA_COMPLETE is set, dw_mci_data_complete and dw_mci_request_end
   will be called to report error to the core.



>>>> +        tasklet_schedule(&host->tasklet);
>>>> +        break;
>>>> +    default:
>>>> +        break;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>>>   static struct dw_mci_of_quirks {
>>>>       char *quirk;
>>>> @@ -2513,6 +2552,9 @@ static struct dw_mci_of_quirks {
>>>>       }, {
>>>>           .quirk    = "disable-wp",
>>>>           .id    = DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT,
>>>> +    }, {
>>>> +        .quirk    = "dto-timer",
>>>> +        .id    = DW_MCI_QUIRK_DTO_TIMER,
>>>>       },
> 
> Well, this is s/w timer, so i'm not sure this can be merged into dt-file.
> If this is generic solution, we can add s/w timer by default. how about?
ok, I will change it in the next patch.

And is there somewhere need to call del_timer?
> 
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
> 
>>>>   };
>>>>   @@ -2654,6 +2696,9 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>>         spin_lock_init(&host->lock);
>>>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&host->queue);
>>>> +    if (host->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_DTO_TIMER)
>>>> +        setup_timer(&host->dto_timer,
>>>> +                dw_mci_dto_timer, (unsigned long)host);
>>>>         /*
>>>>        * Get the host data width - this assumes that HCON has been set with
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
>>>> index 42b724e..2477813 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
>>>> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ struct mmc_data;
>>>>    * @irq_flags: The flags to be passed to request_irq.
>>>>    * @irq: The irq value to be passed to request_irq.
>>>>    * @sdio_id0: Number of slot0 in the SDIO interrupt registers.
>>>> + * @dto_timer: Timer for data over interrupt timeout.
>>>>    *
>>>>    * Locking
>>>>    * =======
>>>> @@ -196,6 +197,8 @@ struct dw_mci {
>>>>       int            irq;
>>>>         int            sdio_id0;
>>>> +
>>>> +    struct timer_list    dto_timer;
>>>>   };
>>>>     /* DMA ops for Internal/External DMAC interface */
>>>> @@ -220,6 +223,8 @@ struct dw_mci_dma_ops {
>>>>   #define DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION    BIT(3)
>>>>   /* No write protect */
>>>>   #define DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT        BIT(4)
>>>> +/* Timer for data over interrupt timeout */
>>>> +#define DW_MCI_QUIRK_DTO_TIMER            BIT(5)
>>>>     /* Slot level quirks */
>>>>   /* This slot has no write protect */
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists