lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJRGBZwxcZX88KZAs_a9HtBBo-EuxTvi7jONtpo=4DVv+i8n+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:10:27 +0800
From:	Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Pengyu Ma <pengyu.ma@...driver.com>
Subject: [RFC patch] I don't want to play with 64bit MMIO in 32bit kernel

hi LKML

There is an on-going development in bugzilla for a patch to move on in
another direction for people who want to play with 64bits PCI BAR on
32bit.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88131

But I send the patch out here to solicit comments for a sable way to
play with pci devices on modern 64bit machine which usually features
64bit BAR in a stable 32bit kernel.

The patch attached forced the BAR  memory resource allocation back to
32bit adress space in acpi root bridge case, then xhci and ixgbe works
every well based on my testing. So I think it's not necessary to use
64Bit BAR in 32bit kernel for stable reason.

Thanks /l

signed-off-by:  Luming Yu <luming.yu@...el.com>

Download attachment "z" of type "application/octet-stream" (836 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ