[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1416383379.30131.14.camel@mm-sol.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:49:39 +0200
From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
To: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <Bjorn.Andersson@...ymobile.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...pv.it>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] pinctrl: pinconf-generic: Allow driver to specify
DT params
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 09:25 -0800, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 10:50AM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 15:53 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Soren Brinkmann
> > > brinkmann@...inx.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Additionally to the generic DT parameters, allow drivers to
> > > > provide driver-specific DT parameters to be used with the
> > > > generic parser infrastructure.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann brinkmann@...inx.com>
> > >
> > > I like the looks of this, but the patch description is a bit
> > > terse. I'd like it to describe some of the refactorings being
> > > done
> > > to the intrinsics, because I have a hard time following the
> > > patch.
> > >
> > > First please rebase onto the "devel" branch in the pin control
> > > tree, and notice that drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> > > which is merged there is actually doing this already:
> > >
> > >
> > > for_each_child_of_node(np_config, np) {
> > > ret = pinconf_generic_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev,
> > > np, map,
> > > &reserv,
> > > nmaps, type);
> > > if (ret)
> > > break;
> > >
> > > ret = pmic_gpio_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np,
> > > map, &reserv,
> > > nmaps, type);
> > > if (ret)
> > > break;
> > > }
> > >
> > > So it should be patched to illustrate the point of this code.
> > >
> >
> > I like the idea, but have issues with implementations :-).
> >
> > It is supposed that additional parameters are not generic,
> > otherwise they will be part of enum pin_config_param, right?
> >
> > Probably it will be better if clients could pass array with
> > driver specific dt bindings to pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map()?
>
> My idea was to hide that API from the driver. You just pass those
> parameters as part of the struct pctldev and the parser - whether
> this generic one or anything else - would do the right thing. I
> don't think calling the parser from the driver is the right approach.
Drivers already know about dt_node_to_map(). My proposal will make
drivers, which register non-standard bindings, little bit simpler.
With your approach probably we can remove dt_node_to_map() and
dt_free_map() callbacks?
Regards,
Ivan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists