lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546C97EC.10905@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:15:24 +0100
From:	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
To:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
CC:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] mm: store mapcount for compound page separate

On 11/19/2014 02:00 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:51:09AM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote:
>> On 11/05/2014 03:49 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>> We're going to allow mapping of individual 4k pages of THP compound and
>>> we need a cheap way to find out how many time the compound page is
>>> mapped with PMD -- compound_mapcount() does this.
>>>
>>> page_mapcount() counts both: PTE and PMD mappings of the page.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/mm.h   | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>>>  include/linux/rmap.h |  4 ++--
>>>  mm/huge_memory.c     | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
>>>  mm/hugetlb.c         |  4 ++--
>>>  mm/memory.c          |  2 +-
>>>  mm/migrate.c         |  2 +-
>>>  mm/page_alloc.c      | 13 ++++++++++---
>>>  mm/rmap.c            | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>  8 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
>>> index 1825c468f158..aef03acff228 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>>> @@ -435,6 +435,19 @@ static inline struct page *compound_head(struct page *page)
>>>  	return page;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static inline atomic_t *compound_mapcount_ptr(struct page *page)
>>> +{
>>> +	return (atomic_t *)&page[1].mapping;
>>> +}
>>
>> IIUC your patch overloads the unused mapping field of the first tail
>> page to store the PMD mapcount. That's a non obvious trick. Why not make
>> it more explicit by adding a new field (say compound_mapcount - and the
>> appropriate comment of course) to the union to which mapping already belong?
> 
> I don't think we want to bloat struct page description: nobody outside of
> helpers should use it direcly. And it's exactly what we did to store
> compound page destructor and compound page order.

Yes, but hiding it might make people think this field is unused when
it's not. If it has been done that way for a while, maybe it's not as
much trouble as I think it is, but could you at least add a comment in
the helper.

> 
>> The patch description would benefit from more explanation too.
> 
> Agreed.
> 



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ