[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11269246.iBzpsM0jDI@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:49:13 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@....ibm.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/core/of: Add symlink to device-tree from devices with an OF node
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 08:45:58 Rob Herring wrote:
> > static inline struct device_node *dev_of_node(struct device *of_node)
> > {
> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
> > return NULL;
> >
> > return dev->of_node;
> > }
> >
> > Adding the IS_ENABLED() in a lot of drivers isn't horrible, but we seem
> > to be doing it a lot.
>
> I think you misread things. of_node is always present now, so it
> should always be NULL for !CONFIG_OF.
>
No, I didn't misread it but I should have been clearer with the intention:
The idea is to tell the compiler that we know it will be NULL when CONFIG_OF
is unset, so it can optimize out all code that does
struct device_node *dn = dev_of_node(dev);
if (dn) {
...
/* complex code */
...
}
and we can avoid using an #ifdef or if(IS_ENABLED()) in the source to
compile out the DT-only sections of a driver.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists