linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/core/of: Add symlink to device-tree from devices with an OF node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACxGe6twb55zSfMhDpmtEFdTZVCVR0VZxNZbRhPwWD949LEuXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:30:12 +0000
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@....ibm.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/core/of: Add symlink to device-tree from devices
 with an OF node

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 19 November 2014 08:45:58 Rob Herring wrote:
>>> > static inline struct device_node *dev_of_node(struct device *of_node)
>>> > {
>>> >         if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
>>> >                 return NULL;
>>> >
>>> >         return dev->of_node;
>>> > }
>>> >
>>> > Adding the IS_ENABLED() in a lot of drivers isn't horrible, but we seem
>>> > to be doing it a lot.
>>>
>>> I think you misread things. of_node is always present now, so it
>>> should always be NULL for !CONFIG_OF.
>>>
>>
>> No, I didn't misread it but I should have been clearer with the intention:
>> The idea is to tell the compiler that we know it will be NULL when CONFIG_OF
>> is unset, so it can optimize out all code that does
>>
>>         struct device_node *dn = dev_of_node(dev);
>>
>>         if (dn) {
>>                 ...
>>                 /* complex code */
>>                 ...
>>         }
>>
>> and we can avoid using an #ifdef or if(IS_ENABLED()) in the source to
>> compile out the DT-only sections of a driver.
>
> Oh, right. That would definitely be worthwhile to do.

Agreed.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/