[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141119165948.GM4042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:59:48 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <k.khlebnikov@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ARM: option for loading modules into vmalloc area
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:57:15AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > I don't think I ever did, because its pretty much impossible to do as I
> > explained in a follow up to this thread.
> >
> > We _used_ to do this with the userspace insmod methods, but since we got
> > this kernel-side linker, it's been pretty much impossible to do without
> > rewriting the module code. That's not going to happen on account of one
> > quirky architecture which Linus doesn't particularly like.
>
> Still... We could try adding a hook in the generic module linker code
> for a pre-relocation pass. Maybe only ARM would use it, but if the need
> to load big modules is real then I imagine Linus could be amenable to a
> compromise.
So, how big a table would you allocate for the trampolines, based upon
not knowing anything about the module being loaded? 4K? 8K? 64K?
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists