[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <BBF8B74B-AECA-4984-81A0-408ED5F8F8C8@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:14:44 -0500
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Carl Hetherington <cth@...lh.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
keyrings@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KEYS: request_key() should reget expired keys rather than give EKEYEXPIRED
On Nov 19, 2014, at 7:22 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Since the keyring facility can be viewed as a cache (at least in some
> applications), the local expiration time on the key should probably be viewed
> as a 'needs updating after this time' property rather than an absolute 'anyone
> now wanting to use this object is out of luck' property.
>
> Since request_key() is the main interface for the usage of keys, this should
> update or replace an expired key rather than issuing EKEYEXPIRED if the local
> expiration has been reached (ie. it should refresh the cache).
>
> For absolute conditions where refreshing the cache probably doesn't help, the
> key can be negatively instantiated using KEYCTL_REJECT_KEY with EKEYEXPIRED
> given as the error to issue. This will still cause request_key() to return
> EKEYEXPIRED as that was explicitly set.
>
> In the future, if the key type has an update op available, we might want to
> upcall with the expired key and allow the upcall to update it. We would pass
> a different operation name (the first column in /etc/request-key.conf) to the
> request-key program.
>
> request_key() returning EKEYEXPIRED is causing an NFS problem which Chuck
> Lever describes thusly:
>
> After about 10 minutes, my NFSv4 functional tests fail because the
> ownership of the test files goes to "-2". Looking at /proc/keys
> shows that the id_resolv keys that map to my test user ID have
> expired. The ownership problem persists until the expired keys are
> purged from the keyring, and fresh keys are obtained.
>
> I bisected the problem to 3.13 commit b2a4df200d57 ("KEYS: Expand
> the capacity of a keyring"). This commit inadvertantly changes the
> API contract of the internal function keyring_search_aux().
>
> The root cause appears to be that b2a4df200d57 made "no state check"
> the default behavior. "No state check" means the keyring search
> iterator function skips checking the key's expiry timeout, and
> returns expired keys. request_key_and_link() depends on getting
> an -EAGAIN result code to know when to perform an upcall to refresh
> an expired key.
>
> This patch can be tested directly by:
>
> keyctl request2 user debug:fred a @s
> keyctl timeout %user:debug:fred 3
> sleep 4
> keyctl request2 user debug:fred a @s
>
> Without the patch, the last command gives error EKEYEXPIRED, but with the
> command it gives a new key.
>
> Reported-by: Carl Hetherington <cth@...lh.net>
> Reported-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
These two patches seem to behave as well as the one I
proposed a few weeks ago.
> ---
>
> security/keys/internal.h | 1 +
> security/keys/keyring.c | 3 ++-
> security/keys/request_key.c | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/keys/internal.h b/security/keys/internal.h
> index b8960c4959a5..200e37867336 100644
> --- a/security/keys/internal.h
> +++ b/security/keys/internal.h
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct keyring_search_context {
> #define KEYRING_SEARCH_NO_UPDATE_TIME 0x0004 /* Don't update times */
> #define KEYRING_SEARCH_NO_CHECK_PERM 0x0008 /* Don't check permissions */
> #define KEYRING_SEARCH_DETECT_TOO_DEEP 0x0010 /* Give an error on excessive depth */
> +#define KEYRING_SEARCH_SKIP_EXPIRED 0x0020 /* Ignore expired keys (intention to replace) */
>
> int (*iterator)(const void *object, void *iterator_data);
>
> diff --git a/security/keys/keyring.c b/security/keys/keyring.c
> index 238aa172f25b..e72548b5897e 100644
> --- a/security/keys/keyring.c
> +++ b/security/keys/keyring.c
> @@ -546,7 +546,8 @@ static int keyring_search_iterator(const void *object, void *iterator_data)
> }
>
> if (key->expiry && ctx->now.tv_sec >= key->expiry) {
> - ctx->result = ERR_PTR(-EKEYEXPIRED);
> + if (!(ctx->flags & KEYRING_SEARCH_SKIP_EXPIRED))
> + ctx->result = ERR_PTR(-EKEYEXPIRED);
> kleave(" = %d [expire]", ctx->skipped_ret);
> goto skipped;
> }
> diff --git a/security/keys/request_key.c b/security/keys/request_key.c
> index 0bb23f98e4ca..0c7aea4dea54 100644
> --- a/security/keys/request_key.c
> +++ b/security/keys/request_key.c
> @@ -516,7 +516,8 @@ struct key *request_key_and_link(struct key_type *type,
> .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp,
> .match_data.raw_data = description,
> .match_data.lookup_type = KEYRING_SEARCH_LOOKUP_DIRECT,
> - .flags = KEYRING_SEARCH_DO_STATE_CHECK,
> + .flags = (KEYRING_SEARCH_DO_STATE_CHECK |
> + KEYRING_SEARCH_SKIP_EXPIRED),
> };
> struct key *key;
> key_ref_t key_ref;
>
--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists