lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1qeaFcdaxLYQu5y4pz-d29SdRA79TpkrRA9VjUYaMfnoSeVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:49:32 -0800
From:	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Turn the card clock off at suspend time

Doug,

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Andrew Bresticker
> <abrestic@...omium.org> wrote:
>> Doug,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>>> Since the dw_mmc driver was first added to Linux it's had a TODO in it
>>> that we should turn off the card clock during suspend.  I have no idea
>>> for sure why it wasn't done originally, but if I had to guess I'd
>>> guess it was related to the lack of a common clock framework.  Let's
>>> do it now.
>>>
>>> There is no reason for the card clock to be left on during suspend and
>>> most systems will eventually turn it off anyway (when whole clock
>>> trees are disabled).  However, it's good to be explicit that it's
>>> disabled at the time that the MMC subsystem is disabled.
>>
>> Should the bus clock (biu) be disabled as well?
>
> Good question.  I'm slightly hesitant to turn biu_clk off in this
> patch, though.  Specifically interrupts are still enabled at this
> point in suspend.  I  guess most interrupts shouldn't be going off
> right now (nobody is accessing storage, right?), but I could imagine
> that a card detect or an SDIO interrupt at just the wrong time could
> cause our ISR to go off _after_ this function is called.  The
> interrupt handling function doesn't know to turn the BIU clock back on
> so you'd get a hang.

Perhaps interrupts should be disabled as well across suspend/resume,
like the sdhci-based hosts do?  Would would happen if we tried to
service an interrupt with the ciu clock disabled?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ