[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141119213006.GE7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:30:07 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] situation with csum_and_copy_... API
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:17:44PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > Seeing a "__get_user()" and just being able to glance up in the same
> > function and seeing the "access_ok()" is just a good safety net. And
> > means that people don't have to waste time thinking about or looking
> > for where the hell the security net really is.
>
> Fair enough.
OK, with 3/5 dropped 4/5 get a trivial conflict (removal of function in 4/5
vs. change in it in 3/5). With that dealt with, the sucker is in
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-davem
Shortlog:
Al Viro (4):
separate kernel- and userland-side msghdr
{compat_,}verify_iovec(): switch to generic copying of iovecs
fold verify_iovec() into copy_msghdr_from_user()
bury skb_copy_to_page()
Diffstat:
arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c | 4 +--
include/linux/socket.h | 17 +++++++---
include/linux/syscalls.h | 6 ++--
include/net/compat.h | 5 ++-
include/net/sock.h | 23 -------------
net/compat.c | 83 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------
net/core/iovec.c | 47 --------------------------
net/socket.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------------
8 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)
I'll post more for review after I finally get some sleep - up for bloody 27
hours by now ;-/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists