linux-kernel - Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFw13opSu6ETXgVo1tjrP+1PLkbsiKewEqRgdBKyBKALWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:40:55 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 21s! [trinity-c42:31480]
> CPU: 2 PID: 31480 Comm: trinity-c42 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc5+ #91 [loadavg: 174.61 150.35 148.64 9/411 32140]
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8a1798b4>]  [<ffffffff8a1798b4>] context_tracking_user_enter+0xa4/0x190
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff8a012fc5>] syscall_trace_leave+0xa5/0x160
>  [<ffffffff8a7d8624>] int_check_syscall_exit_work+0x34/0x3d

Hmm, if we are getting soft-lockups here, maybe it suggest too much exit-work.

Some TIF_NOHZ loop, perhaps? You have nohz on, don't you?

That makes me wonder: does the problem go away if you disable NOHZ?

> CPU: 0 PID: 27716 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc5+ #91 [loadavg: 174.61 150.35 148.64 9/411 32140]
> Workqueue: events nohz_kick_work_fn
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8a0ffb52>]  [<ffffffff8a0ffb52>] smp_call_function_many+0x1b2/0x320
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff8a0fa3f5>] tick_nohz_full_kick_all+0x35/0x70
>  [<ffffffff8a0ec8fe>] nohz_kick_work_fn+0xe/0x10
>  [<ffffffff8a08e61d>] process_one_work+0x1fd/0x590
>  [<ffffffff8a08eacb>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x490
>  [<ffffffff8a0942e9>] kthread+0xf9/0x110
>  [<ffffffff8a7d82ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0

Yeah, there's certainly some NOHZ work going on on CPU0 too.


> CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc5+ #91 [loadavg: 174.61 150.35 148.64 10/411 32140]
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8a3e14a5>]  [<ffffffff8a3e14a5>] intel_idle+0xd5/0x180
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff8a666075>] cpuidle_enter_state+0x55/0x1c0
>  [<ffffffff8a666297>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
>  [<ffffffff8a0bb323>] cpu_startup_entry+0x433/0x4e0
>  [<ffffffff8a02b763>] start_secondary+0x1a3/0x220

Nothing.

> CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc5+ #91 [loadavg: 174.61 150.35 148.64 10/411 32140]
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8a3e14a5>]  [<ffffffff8a3e14a5>] intel_idle+0xd5/0x180
>  [<ffffffff8a666075>] cpuidle_enter_state+0x55/0x1c0
>  [<ffffffff8a666297>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
>  [<ffffffff8a0bb323>] cpu_startup_entry+0x433/0x4e0
>  [<ffffffff8a02b763>] start_secondary+0x1a3/0x220

Nothing.

Hmm. NOHZ?

                     Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/