[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141120084152.GL7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 08:41:52 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] macvtap: advance iov iterator when needed in
macvtap_put_user()
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 04:34:26PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 04:31:05PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > When mergeable buffer is used, vnet_hdr_sz is greater than sizeof struct
> > virtio_net_hdr. So we need advance the iov iterators in this case.
> >
> > Fixes 6c36d2e26cda1ad3e2c4b90dd843825fc62fe5b4 ("macvtap: Use iovec iterators")
> > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>
> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
I'm not sure it's a good behaviour, actually - should we just leave an
unmodified gap in userland buffer there, with whatever garbage it might
have contained?
I do realize that this is what we used to do, but it might end up a source
of hard to debug userland bugs... Perhaps that iov_iter_advance(iter, size)
would better be replaced with iov_iter_zero(size, iter)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists