[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141120100328.GO4042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:03:29 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, pankaj.dubey@...sung.com,
	kgene.kim@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] drivers: soc: Add support for Exynos PMU driver
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:09:25AM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Makefile b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> index 063113d..44d220d 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)		+= qcom/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA)	+= tegra/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_TI)		+= ti/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PLAT_VERSATILE)	+= versatile/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= samsung/
Is ARCH_EXYNOS appropriate here, or is your new SOC_SAMSUNG better?
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a424ebc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +#
> +# SAMSUNG SOC drivers
> +#
> +menuconfig SOC_SAMSUNG
> +	bool "Samsung SOC drivers support"
If you intend to select SOC_SAMSUNG, is there any point in making this
a user-visible symbol?
-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists