[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHse=S--yNmP5sTr2kg_7kb2V8Lh2FioTSH_o23MstVrdt4Wmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:28:22 +0000
From: David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Meredydd Luff <meredydd@...atehouse.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 4/5] sparc: Hook up execveat system call.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:27:51 +0000 David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/systbls_64.S b/arch/sparc/kernel/systbls_64.S
>> index 580cde9370c9..15069cb35dac 100644
>> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/systbls_64.S
>> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/systbls_64.S
>> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ sys_call_table32:
>> .word sys_syncfs, compat_sys_sendmmsg, sys_setns, compat_sys_process_vm_readv, compat_sys_process_vm_writev
>> /*340*/ .word sys_kern_features, sys_kcmp, sys_finit_module, sys_sched_setattr, sys_sched_getattr
>> .word sys32_renameat2, sys_seccomp, sys_getrandom, sys_memfd_create, sys_bpf
>> +/*350*/ .word sys_execveat
>
> Shouldn't this be compat_sys_execveat?
Yeah, that would make sense -- thanks for spotting.
Looking at this more closely, I also wonder if we need a pair of wrappers
analogous to sys(32|64)_execve -- they include a (pipeline-executed)
flushw instruction after the jmpl to [compat_]sys_execve, which I guess
might be needed. So I could add something like the following to
arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S:
sys64_execveat:
set sys_execveat, %g1
jmpl %g1, %g0
flushw
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
sys32_execveat:
set compat_sys_execveat, %g1
jmpl %g1, %g0
flushw
#endif
However, I don't speak SPARC and can't run the code -- any thoughts
out there from someone who does & can?
Or maybe I should stop trying to be helpful with speculative patches, and
just leave wiring up the sparc stuff to the experts...
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists