[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201411201341.30112.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:41:29 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, arm@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
"Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 3.19 #2
On Wednesday 19 November 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Another DT pull-request for 3.19. For this one, I had to pull one Vinod's topic
> branch to be able to include the XDMA DT properties. This branch is stable and
> based on 3.18-rc3 (Cf. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304041.html).
> Note that my previous DT pull-request for 3.19 was based on 3.18-rc2.
> So, this is what I did:
> - took a v3.18-rc3 tag
> - merged the at91-3.19-dt branch that you already have in at91/dt (you'd taken the at91-dt tag)
> - merged the topic/at_xdmac from Vinod
> - stacked the new material described above on top of this.
> Tell me if it's okay for you or if I have to arrange things differently.
>
> The content itself is pretty straightforward.
>
I've pulled it into a new next/dt2 branch, so we don't have to coordinate the merging
with Vinod. If he sends the slave-dma tree first, this will be part of the normal
next/dt submission to Linus, otherwise it will come a few days later.
Thanks,
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists