linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] adp1653: Add device tree bindings for LED controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:48:27 +0100
From:	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>, pali.rohar@...il.com,
	sre@...ian.org, sre@...g0.de,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org,
	aaro.koskinen@....fi, freemangordon@....bg, bcousson@...libre.com,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] adp1653: Add device tree bindings for LED controller

Hi Pavel,

On 11/20/2014 01:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I would also swap the segments of a property name to follow the convention
>> as in case of "regulator-max-microamp".
>>
>> Updated version:
>>
>> ==========================================================
>>
>> Optional properties for child nodes:
>> - max-microamp : maximum intensity in microamperes of the LED
>> 		 (torch LED for flash devices)
>> - flash-max-microamp : maximum intensity in microamperes of the
>> 		       flash LED; it is mandatory if the led should
>> 		       support the flash mode
>> - flash-timeout-microsec : timeout in microseconds after which the flash
>> 		           led is turned off
>
> Works for me. Do you want to submit a patch or should I do it?

You can submit a patch for leds/common.txt and a separate patch for the
adp1653 with a reference to the leds/common.txt for the child nodes.

>
>> - indicator-pattern : identifier of the blinking pattern for the
>> 		      indicator led
>>
>
> This would need a bit more documentation, no?

- indicator-pattern : identifier of the blinking pattern for the
  		      indicator led; valid identifiers should be
		      defined in the documentation of the parent
		      node.

I wouldn't go for pre-defined identifiers as the pattern
can be a combination of various settings like ramp-up, ramp-down,
pulse time etc. Drivers should expose only few combinations of
these settings in my opinion, like e.g. leds-lm355x.c does.

Regards,
Jacek

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/