[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUnjii54nfUaCR6AH_pbb+71dJWXC=qvjj7mOJPeVT_qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:11:56 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] sched, x86: Check that we're on the right stack in
schedule and __might_sleep
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>>
>> I'm very hesitant to use irq_enter for this, though. I think we want
>> just the irq_count part.
>
> Oh, I agree. I mentioned irq_enter/exit() just as the place the
> preempt count increment normally happens. I have nothing against doing
> it manually for these things that really aren't normal interrupts.
>
It may need to be considerably more complicated to keep RCU happy,
though. In fact, I think that this code is already wrong.
I'll write something and cc Paul to get some feedback.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists