[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141120151954.GB3370@treble.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:19:54 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, kpatch@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] kernel: add support for live patching
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 07:29:23PM -0600, Seth Jennings wrote:
> +static int lpc_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + struct module *mod = data;
> + struct lpc_patch *patch;
> + struct lpc_object *obj;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&lpc_mutex);
> +
> + if (action != MODULE_STATE_COMING && action != MODULE_STATE_GOING)
> + goto out;
I think we can get the mutex here instead of above so it doesn't block
other module actions (and then you can also get rid of the "out" label).
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(patch, &lpc_patches, list) {
> + if (patch->state == LPC_DISABLED)
> + continue;
> + list_for_each_entry(obj, &patch->objs, list) {
> + if (strcmp(obj->name, mod->name))
> + continue;
> + if (action == MODULE_STATE_COMING) {
> + obj->mod = mod;
> + lpc_module_notify_coming(patch->mod, obj);
> + } else /* MODULE_STATE_GOING */
> + lpc_module_notify_going(patch->mod, obj);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&lpc_mutex);
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists