linux-kernel - Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <546E204B.5080106@mellanox.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:09:31 +0200
From:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()

On 11/20/2014 10:17 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:13:57AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>> >  9 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> grr... 8 files changed, actually - that was from the diff that included mlx4
> bits.  Patch split correctly and sent in two pieces, summary left as is ;-/
> Sorry about the confusion it might cause...
Al,

I think the best way to proceed here is to come up with mlx4 and mlx5 
patches and get both of them in through netdev / net-nexttree, don't 
worry about each of these drivers have a part which is also under 
drivers/infiniband/hw -- it doesn't justify splitting in this case

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/