[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141120190058.GA31214@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:00:59 -0500
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
hch@...radead.org, mst@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH] virtio_blk: fix defaults for max_hw_sectors and
max_segment_size
virtio_blk incorrectly established -1U as the default for these
queue_limits. Set these limits to sane default values to avoid crashing
the kernel. But the virtio-blk protocol should probably be extended to
allow proper stacking of the disk's limits from the host.
This change fixes a crash that was reported when virtio-blk was used to
test linux-dm.git commit 604ea90641b4 ("dm thin: adjust max_sectors_kb
based on thinp blocksize") that will initially set max_sectors to
max_hw_sectors and then rounddown to the first power-of-2 factor of the
DM thin-pool's blocksize. Basically that commit assumes drivers don't
suck when establishing max_hw_sectors so it acted like a canary in the
coal mine.
In the case of a DM thin-pool built ontop of virtio-blk data device
these are the insane limits that were established for the DM thin-pool:
# cat /sys/block/dm-6/queue/max_sectors_kb
1073741824
# cat /sys/block/dm-6/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb
2147483647
by stacking the virtio-blk device's limits:
# cat /sys/block/vdb/queue/max_sectors_kb
512
# cat /sys/block/vdb/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb
2147483647
Attempting to mkfs.xfs against a thin device from this thin-pool quickly
resulted in fs/direct-io.c:dio_send_cur_page()'s BUG_ON.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 9 ++++++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index c6a27d5..68efbdc 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -674,8 +674,11 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
/* No need to bounce any requests */
blk_queue_bounce_limit(q, BLK_BOUNCE_ANY);
- /* No real sector limit. */
- blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, -1U);
+ /*
+ * Limited by disk's max_hw_sectors in host, but
+ * without that info establish a sane default.
+ */
+ blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS);
/* Host can optionally specify maximum segment size and number of
* segments. */
@@ -684,7 +687,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
if (!err)
blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, v);
else
- blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, -1U);
+ blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, BLK_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE);
/* Host can optionally specify the block size of the device */
err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE,
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists