lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEP_g=8wTikyBq8FSQHM16VKa_n-1vMeSo9MK6N6Wg8pyEQTcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:14:24 -0800
From:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
To:	Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	linux.nics@...el.com, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...el.com>,
	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/5] i40e: Implement ndo_gso_check()

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 04, 2014 15:45:22 Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com> wrote:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c index c3a7f4a..21829b5
>> > 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>> > +static bool i40e_gso_check(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>> > +{
>> > +       if ((skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL) &&
>> > +           (skb->inner_protocol_type != ENCAP_TYPE_ETHER ||
>> > +            skb->inner_protocol != htons(ETH_P_TEB) ||
>> > +            skb_inner_mac_header(skb) - skb_transport_header(skb) > 64))
>> > +               return false;
>>
>> I think it may be possible to even support a few more things here.
>> According to the datasheet here:
>> http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/xl71
>> 0-10-40-controller-datasheet.pdf
>>
>> This can actually support 64 bytes beyond the tunnel header, which
>> would make for a total of 80 bytes. It looks like it can also support
>> IPv4 or IPv6 beyond just Ethernet as the encapsulated protocol.
>>
>> Intel guys, can you confirm that this is correct?
>
> I'm just respinning this for v4/6 beyond GRE/UDP tunnel and IPIP, and I found
> the description of max protocol parsing size of 480B (with individual header
> limit of 255B). I couldn't find where you get this 64/80 number or which
> headers it maps to. Could you (or one of the intel guys) expand on this?

The number that I gave was from the section on Geneve support (on page
708), which says that it can support up to 64 bytes of options (this
was also my understanding from previous conversations with Intel
guys). I searched for 480 byte limit and it seems like it for receive
instead of transmit, which could conceivably be different.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ