[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141120203020.GJ31889@laptop.dumpdata.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:30:21 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
david.vrabel@...rix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/13] swiotlb-xen: pass dev_addr to
xen_dma_unmap_page and xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:47:51AM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:40:53AM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > xen_dma_unmap_page and xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu take a dma_addr_t
> > > > handle as argument, not a physical address.
> > >
> > > Ouch. Should this also go on stable tree?
> >
> > Good idea
>
> Also can I take that as an Acked-by for this patch?
Yes.
>
>
> There is one last bit of common and x86 changes in this series:
> patch #7 adds a paramter to xen_dma_map_page, even though the x86
> implementation is empty:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=141579253829808&w=2
>
> is that OK for you?
Yes.
>
>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 6 +++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> > > > index 3725ee4..498b654 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> > > > @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void xen_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
> > > >
> > > > BUG_ON(dir == DMA_NONE);
> > > >
> > > > - xen_dma_unmap_page(hwdev, paddr, size, dir, attrs);
> > > > + xen_dma_unmap_page(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir, attrs);
> > > >
> > > > /* NOTE: We use dev_addr here, not paddr! */
> > > > if (is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dev_addr)) {
> > > > @@ -497,14 +497,14 @@ xen_swiotlb_sync_single(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
> > > > BUG_ON(dir == DMA_NONE);
> > > >
> > > > if (target == SYNC_FOR_CPU)
> > > > - xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(hwdev, paddr, size, dir);
> > > > + xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir);
> > > >
> > > > /* NOTE: We use dev_addr here, not paddr! */
> > > > if (is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dev_addr))
> > > > swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(hwdev, paddr, size, dir, target);
> > > >
> > > > if (target == SYNC_FOR_DEVICE)
> > > > - xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(hwdev, paddr, size, dir);
> > > > + xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir);
> > > >
> > > > if (dir != DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
> > > > return;
> > > > --
> > > > 1.7.10.4
> > > >
> > >
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists