[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <AC569D54-4EA9-4090-AE7E-816576BCF2B8@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 03:09:36 +0200
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KVM causes #GP on XRSTORS
> On Nov 21, 2014, at 02:10, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Nadav,
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 06:34:04PM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> Fenghua,
>>
>> I got KVM (v3.17) crashing on a machine that supports XRSTORS - It appears to get a #GP when it is trying to load the guest FPU.
>> One reason for the #GP is that XCOMP_BV[63] is zeroed on the guest_fpu, but I am not sure it is the only problem.
>> Was KVM ever tested with XRSTORS?
>
> Current kvm and qemu use standard format and xsaves/xrstors should use
> compact format, in addition, vmx is still not enabled for xsaves/xrstors
> in kvm.
Sorry, but I don’t quite understand. Should KVM work on a machine that supports xsaves/xrstors?
I am not referring to whether KVM exposes the capability to the guest, but to whether KVM should work at all.
Thanks,
Nadav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists