lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:30:50 +0800
From:	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
	Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] KVM: x86: fix access memslots w/o hold srcu read lock

Hi Tang,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 02:41:57PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>Hi Wanpeng,
>
>Sorry, it is about this problem again.
>
>I booted 3.18.0-rc2, without Paolo's patch. lockdep and RCU debug
>were all opened.
>
>Then I started a qemu vm with the following options:
>
>/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -hda rhel7.0ga-x64.qcow2 -m 512M -cpu
>host,-x2apic -serial stdio
>
>I added printk() in kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page(), and it was
>printed out.
>So I think I can confirm that I have run into
>kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page().
>
>But I still didn't see any warning.
>
>Is there anything else I should do ?
>Would you please share your qemu command with me ?

I test it on the other guy's Ivytown and take advantage of the qemu command 
line which he used, so I forget the accurate command line which used that day.

Paolo also reproduce the bug, Paolo, ping.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 

>
>Thanks. :)
>
>On 11/14/2014 07:39 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>Hi Tang,
>>On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:35:29PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>>>Hi Wanpeng,
>>>
>>Sorry for the late.
>>
>>>I think I have totally missed this thread.
>>>I opened lockdep and RCU debug, and tried on 3.18-rc1. But I didn't
>>>get the warning.
>>I also opened lockdep and RCU debug, and tried 3.18.0-rc2 on a Ivy
>>bridge, the warning will be triggered after run qemu immediately. There
>>is no need to try any hotplug related stuff.
>>
>>In addition, Paolo's patch is merged upstream to fix this.
>>
>>commit a73896cb5bbdce672945745db8224352a689f580
>>Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>Date:   Sun Nov 2 07:54:30 2014 +0100
>>
>>KVM: vmx: defer load of APIC access page address during reset
>>
>>Regards,
>>Wanpeng Li
>>
>>>My steps are:
>>>
>>>1. Use numactl to bind a qemu process to node1.
>>>2. Offline all node1 memory. And the qemu process is still running.
>>>
>>>Would you please tell me how did you reproduce it ?
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>On 11/02/2014 03:07 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>>The srcu read lock must be held while accessing memslots (e.g.
>>>>when using gfn_to_* functions), however, commit c24ae0dcd3e8
>>>>("kvm: x86: Unpin and remove kvm_arch->apic_access_page") call
>>>>gfn_to_page() in kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page() w/o hold it in
>>>>vmx_vcpu_reset() path which leads to suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
>>>>usage warning. This patch fix it by holding srcu read lock in all
>>>>kvm_vcpu_reset() call path.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
>>>>3.18.0-rc2-test2+ #70 Not tainted
>>>>-------------------------------
>>>>include/linux/kvm_host.h:474 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>>>>
>>>>other info that might help us debug this:
>>>>
>>>>rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
>>>>1 lock held by qemu-system-x86/2371:
>>>>  #0:  (&vcpu->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa037d800>] vcpu_load+0x20/0xd0 [kvm]
>>>>
>>>>stack backtrace:
>>>>CPU: 4 PID: 2371 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc2-test2+ #70
>>>>Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 9010/0M9KCM, BIOS A12 01/10/2013
>>>>  0000000000000001 ffff880209983ca8 ffffffff816f514f 0000000000000000
>>>>  ffff8802099b8990 ffff880209983cd8 ffffffff810bd687 00000000000fee00
>>>>  ffff880208a2c000 ffff880208a10000 ffff88020ef50040 ffff880209983d08
>>>>Call Trace:
>>>>  [<ffffffff816f514f>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x71
>>>>  [<ffffffff810bd687>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
>>>>  [<ffffffffa037d055>] gfn_to_memslot+0xd5/0xe0 [kvm]
>>>>  [<ffffffffa03807d3>] __gfn_to_pfn+0x33/0x60 [kvm]
>>>>  [<ffffffffa0380885>] gfn_to_page+0x25/0x90 [kvm]
>>>>  [<ffffffffa038aeec>] kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page+0x3c/0x80 [kvm]
>>>>  [<ffffffffa08f0a9c>] vmx_vcpu_reset+0x20c/0x460 [kvm_intel]
>>>>  [<ffffffffa039ab8e>] kvm_vcpu_reset+0x15e/0x1b0 [kvm]
>>>>  [<ffffffffa039ac0c>] kvm_arch_vcpu_setup+0x2c/0x50 [kvm]
>>>>  [<ffffffffa037f7e0>] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x1d0/0x780 [kvm]
>>>>  [<ffffffff810bc664>] ? __lock_is_held+0x54/0x80
>>>>  [<ffffffff812231f0>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x300/0x520
>>>>  [<ffffffff8122ee45>] ? __fget+0x5/0x250
>>>>  [<ffffffff8122f0fa>] ? __fget_light+0x2a/0xe0
>>>>  [<ffffffff81223491>] SyS_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
>>>>  [<ffffffff816fed6d>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>>>
>>>>Reported-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
>>>>Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
>>>>Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>>>Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
>>>>---
>>>>v3 -> v4:
>>>>  * bypass the problem altoghter by kvm_make_request
>>>>v2 -> v3:
>>>>  * take care all vmx_vcpu_reset call path
>>>>v1 -> v2:
>>>>  * just fix hold the srcu read lock in vmx_vcpu_reset path
>>>>
>>>>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |    2 +-
>>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>>index a0f78db..3e556c6 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>>@@ -4579,7 +4579,7 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>>  		vmcs_write32(TPR_THRESHOLD, 0);
>>>>  	}
>>>>-	kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page(vcpu);
>>>>+	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_APIC_PAGE_RELOAD, vcpu);
>>>>  	if (vmx_vm_has_apicv(vcpu->kvm))
>>>>  		memset(&vmx->pi_desc, 0, sizeof(struct pi_desc));
>>.
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists