linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfio: put off the allocation of "minor" in vfio_create

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <546E948E.2090502@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:25:34 +0800
From:	leizhen <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
CC:	KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>,
	Tianhong Ding <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfio: put off the allocation of "minor" in vfio_create_group

On 2014/11/20 23:37, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 19:25 +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> The next code fragment "list_for_each_entry" is not depend on "minor". With this
>> patch, the free of "minor" in "list_for_each_entry" can be reduced, and there is
>> no functional change.
> 
> A reasonable micro-optimization, but I'm curious if you're actually
> seeing some measurable overhead from this.  It seems like we'd need to

Oh, I just found this by code review. It's good to put pure check first and
resource allocation later, if they are order independent. Isn't it?
I think it will not improve performance but only save a little code space
and looks feel better.

> have multiple devices, all within the same IOMMU group, all probed by
> vfio-pci at the same time to exercise the race condition.  Thanks,

I think vfio_create_group can not be invoked frequently. So, the performance of this function
is not a major consideration, we don't care slightly performance change.

> 
> Alex
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 13 ++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>> index f018d8d..737eb468 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>> @@ -225,22 +225,21 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
>>
>>  	mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
>>
>> -	minor = vfio_alloc_group_minor(group);
>> -	if (minor < 0) {
>> -		vfio_group_unlock_and_free(group);
>> -		return ERR_PTR(minor);
>> -	}
>> -
>>  	/* Did we race creating this group? */
>>  	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &vfio.group_list, vfio_next) {
>>  		if (tmp->iommu_group == iommu_group) {
>>  			vfio_group_get(tmp);
>> -			vfio_free_group_minor(minor);
>>  			vfio_group_unlock_and_free(group);
>>  			return tmp;
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>
>> +	minor = vfio_alloc_group_minor(group);
>> +	if (minor < 0) {
>> +		vfio_group_unlock_and_free(group);
>> +		return ERR_PTR(minor);
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	dev = device_create(vfio.class, NULL,
>>  			    MKDEV(MAJOR(vfio.group_devt), minor),
>>  			    group, "%d", iommu_group_id(iommu_group));
>> --
>> 1.8.0
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/