linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/10] Replace _PAGE_NUMA with PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141121093141.GU2725@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:31:41 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LinuxPPC-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Replace _PAGE_NUMA with PAGE_NONE protections v2

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 04:50:25PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 11/20/2014 05:19 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > V1 failed while running under kvm-tools very quickly and a second report
> > indicated that it happens on bare metal as well. This version survived
> > an overnight run of trinity running under kvm-tools here but verification
> > from Sasha would be appreciated.
> 
> Hi Mel,
> 
> I tried giving it a spin, but it won't apply at all on the latest -mm
> tree:
> 
> $ git am -3 numa/*
> Applying: mm: numa: Do not dereference pmd outside of the lock during NUMA hinting fault
> Applying: mm: Add p[te|md] protnone helpers for use by NUMA balancing
> Applying: mm: Convert p[te|md]_numa users to p[te|md]_protnone_numa
> fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless (mm/huge_memory.c).
> Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge.
> Cannot fall back to three-way merge.
> 
> Did I miss a prerequisite?
> 

No. V2 was still against 3.18-rc4 as that was what I had vanilla kernel
test data for. V3 will be against latest mmotm.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/