linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rtc: da9063: Fix ALARM interrupt registration.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:04:06 +0000
From:	Dmitry Lavnikevich <D.Lavnikevich@...-solutions.com>
To:	"Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
CC:	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
	"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: da9063: Fix ALARM interrupt registration.


> On 20Nov, 2014, at 15:43, Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com> wrote:
> 
> On 20 November 2014 13:09 Dmitry Lavnikevich wrote:
> [...]
>>> 
>>> da9063-rtc da9063-rtc: Failed to request ALARM IRQ -22: -22
>>> da9063-rtc: probe of da9063-rtc failed with error -22
>> 
>> I have tested this patch on pfla02 board and it was ok. On which
>> board this fail occurred?
> 
> I am using a MCIMX6DL-SDP board -- although I the differences are in
> my code base and not the platform in this case.
> My apologies 
> 
> Regards,
> Steve
> 
> patch follows:
[…]

I see that your code also fixes the issue. And it is more consistent with da9055 implementation.
So there is no need for my fix if yours is already there. Is it already accepted on some mainline branch?
If not then are you going to submit it soon?