[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546F3D59.2060504@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:25:45 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
CC: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: thermal: Exynos: Deletion of unnecessary checks before two function
calls
>> for (i = 0; i < th_zone->cool_dev_size; i++) {
>> - if (th_zone->cool_dev[i])
>> - cpufreq_cooling_unregister(th_zone->cool_dev[i]);
>> + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(th_zone->cool_dev[i]);
>> }
>
> Now you have unnecessary {}
How are the chances that your source code transformation tool
can also consider the deletion of curly brackets in such an use case?
Can any more pretty-printing rules be integrated from a specific
coding style configuration?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists