linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] ARM: mediatek: Add sysirq interrupt polarity support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1416584167.24971.9.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date:	Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:36:07 +0800
From:	Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
To:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hc.yen@...iatek.com" <hc.yen@...iatek.com>,
	"srv_heupstream@...iatek.com" <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
	"yh.chen@...iatek.com" <yh.chen@...iatek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"nathan.chung@...iatek.com" <nathan.chung@...iatek.com>,
	"yingjoe.chen@...il.com" <yingjoe.chen@...il.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	"eddie.huang@...iatek.com" <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] ARM: mediatek: Add sysirq interrupt polarity
 support

Hi Mark,


On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 18:04 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:14:09PM +0000, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> > +	if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING) {
> > +		if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> > +			type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
> > +		else
> > +			type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
> > +		value |= (1 << offset);
> > +	} else
> > +		value &= ~(1 << offset);
> 
> Nit: if one branch of an if statements is bracketed, both branches
> should be. Please bracket the else case.

OK, will change in next version.

> > +	writel(value, chip_data->intpol_base + reg_index * 4);
> > +
> > +	data = data->parent_data;
> > +	ret = data->chip->irq_set_type(data, type);
> > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip_data->lock, flags);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct irq_chip mtk_sysirq_chip = {
> > +	.name			= "MT_SYSIRQ",
> > +	.irq_mask		= irq_chip_mask_parent,
> > +	.irq_unmask		= irq_chip_unmask_parent,
> > +	.irq_eoi		= irq_chip_eoi_parent,
> > +	.irq_set_type		= mtk_sysirq_set_type,
> > +	.irq_retrigger		= irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy,
> > +	.irq_set_affinity	= irq_chip_set_affinity_parent,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int mtk_sysirq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> > +				   struct device_node *controller,
> > +				   const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
> > +				   unsigned long *out_hwirq,
> > +				   unsigned int *out_type)
> > +{
> > +	if (intsize < 3)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	/* sysirq doesn't support PPI */
> > +	if (intspec[0])
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	*out_hwirq = intspec[1];
> > +	*out_type = intspec[2] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> 
> All of this is very strongly tied to the GIC, but the binding made it
> sound like this was more generic (it didn't specify the number of cells
> or their meaning). It doesn't look like we validate that this is
> attached to a GIC.
> 
> Do we expect this to only ever be attached to a GICv2?
> 
> It would be nice to either make this generic or to describe the format
> in the binding.

This expect the parent to use the same interrupt cells format as GIC.
I'll fix the binding to make this more clear.

> Also, surely you expect intsize == 3 if you expect a GICv2? Likewise in
> mtk_sysirq_domain_alloc.

OK, will change that in next version.

Joe.C


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/