[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546F5ED7.1000206@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:48:39 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB: serial: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function
call "release_firmware"
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/mxuport.c b/drivers/usb/serial/mxuport.c
>> index ab1d690..3653ec1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/mxuport.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/mxuport.c
>> @@ -1101,8 +1101,7 @@ static int mxuport_probe(struct usb_serial *serial,
>> */
>> usb_set_serial_data(serial, (void *)id->driver_info);
>> out:
>> - if (fw_p)
>> - release_firmware(fw_p);
>> + release_firmware(fw_p);
>
> I think that the if should stay.
I have got an other opinion.
> There were two cases on the allocation, so there should be two cases
> on the release.
I find that this implementation detail does not really matter for the
necessity of a null pointer check directly before such a function call.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists