linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Remove unwanted reg_se

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKbBDD=eYmU=LuViwLPNV=kYCziDQgKjL07bT7og4vsj0Ee7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:17:18 +0100
From:	Johannes Pointner <johannes.pointner@...il.com>
To:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc:	Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Brad Griffis <bgriffis@...com>,
	Sanjeev Sharma <sanjeev_sharma@...tor.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Jan Kardell <jan.kardell@...liq.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Remove unwanted
 reg_se_cache save

Before the patches were also jumps but I thought it is something
Vignesh should know. Maybe there is some fix for that too?
As Richard also noted, it would be nice if ti could let us know how to
get the delay values right. By trial and error is IMHO not the best
way.
For the testing I used 3.16.7.


2014-11-21 16:37 GMT+01:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>:
> On Friday 21 November 2014 08:41 PM, Johannes Pointner wrote:
>> I tested version 4 of the patch series on a custom design and I saw
>> also the jumps as described by Richard. I played a little with the
>> sample delay and it got better but I couldn't completely remove the
>> jumps.
>
> And before the patches were applied, there were no jumps at all? Which
> kernel are you using for testing?
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/