| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20141121212631.GF5395@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:26:31 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
acme@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] perf: add ability to sample machine state on
interrupt
Em Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 01:48:37PM +0200, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> Enable capture of interrupted machine state for each
> sample.
>
> Registers to sample are passed per event in the
> sample_regs_intr bitmask.
>
> To sample interrupt machine state, the
> PERF_SAMPLE_INTR_REGS must be passed in
> sample_type.
>
> The list of available registers is arch
> dependent and provided by asm/perf_regs.h
>
> Registers are laid out as u64 in the order
> of the bit order of sample_intr_regs.
>
> This patch also adds a new ABI version
> PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER4 because we extend
> the perf_event_attr struct with a new u64
> field.
So, trying to bisect a problem with how the TUI hist_entries browser
renders callchains I got stuck with:
[root@zoo acme]# perf report
incompatible file format (rerun with -v to learn more)
[root@zoo acme]# perf report -v
file uses a more recent and unsupported ABI (8 bytes extra)
Because the perf.data file was generated with HEAD of perf/core and
probably the above warning comes from a simple check against the ABI
version...
I wonder if we can't just check that there are no sample_types that we
don't know and if not, just process the file anyway, i.e. the sample
will be parseable, no?
For now, in this case, I'll just regenerate the perf.data file with an
older tool...
- Arnaldo
> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 7 ++++--
> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 15 ++++++++++++-
> kernel/events/core.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 893a0d0..68d46d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct perf_branch_stack {
> struct perf_branch_entry entries[0];
> };
>
> -struct perf_regs_user {
> +struct perf_regs {
> __u64 abi;
> struct pt_regs *regs;
> };
> @@ -600,7 +600,8 @@ struct perf_sample_data {
> struct perf_callchain_entry *callchain;
> struct perf_raw_record *raw;
> struct perf_branch_stack *br_stack;
> - struct perf_regs_user regs_user;
> + struct perf_regs regs_user;
> + struct perf_regs regs_intr;
> u64 stack_user_size;
> u64 weight;
> /*
> @@ -630,6 +631,8 @@ static inline void perf_sample_data_init(struct perf_sample_data *data,
> data->weight = 0;
> data->data_src.val = PERF_MEM_NA;
> data->txn = 0;
> + data->regs_intr.abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE;
> + data->regs_intr.regs = NULL;
> }
>
> extern void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index 9269de2..48d4a01 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -137,8 +137,9 @@ enum perf_event_sample_format {
> PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC = 1U << 15,
> PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER = 1U << 16,
> PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION = 1U << 17,
> + PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR = 1U << 18,
>
> - PERF_SAMPLE_MAX = 1U << 18, /* non-ABI */
> + PERF_SAMPLE_MAX = 1U << 19, /* non-ABI */
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -238,6 +239,7 @@ enum perf_event_read_format {
> #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER2 80 /* add: branch_sample_type */
> #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER3 96 /* add: sample_regs_user */
> /* add: sample_stack_user */
> +#define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER4 104 /* add: sample_regs_intr */
>
> /*
> * Hardware event_id to monitor via a performance monitoring event:
> @@ -334,6 +336,15 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
>
> /* Align to u64. */
> __u32 __reserved_2;
> + /*
> + * Defines set of regs to dump for each sample
> + * state captured on:
> + * - precise = 0: PMU interrupt
> + * - precise > 0: sampled instruction
> + *
> + * See asm/perf_regs.h for details.
> + */
> + __u64 sample_regs_intr;
> };
>
> #define perf_flags(attr) (*(&(attr)->read_format + 1))
> @@ -686,6 +697,8 @@ enum perf_event_type {
> * { u64 weight; } && PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT
> * { u64 data_src; } && PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC
> * { u64 transaction; } && PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION
> + * { u64 abi; # enum perf_sample_regs_abi
> + * u64 regs[weight(mask)]; } && PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR
> * };
> */
> PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE = 9,
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index eaa636e..7941343 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -4430,7 +4430,7 @@ perf_output_sample_regs(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
> }
> }
>
> -static void perf_sample_regs_user(struct perf_regs_user *regs_user,
> +static void perf_sample_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> if (!user_mode(regs)) {
> @@ -4446,6 +4446,14 @@ static void perf_sample_regs_user(struct perf_regs_user *regs_user,
> }
> }
>
> +static void perf_sample_regs_intr(struct perf_regs *regs_intr,
> + struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + regs_intr->regs = regs;
> + regs_intr->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
> +}
> +
> +
> /*
> * Get remaining task size from user stack pointer.
> *
> @@ -4827,6 +4835,23 @@ void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
> if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION)
> perf_output_put(handle, data->txn);
>
> + if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR) {
> + u64 abi = data->regs_intr.abi;
> + /*
> + * If there are no regs to dump, notice it through
> + * first u64 being zero (PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE).
> + */
> + perf_output_put(handle, abi);
> +
> + if (abi) {
> + u64 mask = event->attr.sample_regs_intr;
> +
> + perf_output_sample_regs(handle,
> + data->regs_intr.regs,
> + mask);
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (!event->attr.watermark) {
> int wakeup_events = event->attr.wakeup_events;
>
> @@ -4913,7 +4938,7 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_event_header *header,
> * in case new sample type is added, because we could eat
> * up the rest of the sample size.
> */
> - struct perf_regs_user *uregs = &data->regs_user;
> + struct perf_regs *uregs = &data->regs_user;
> u16 stack_size = event->attr.sample_stack_user;
> u16 size = sizeof(u64);
>
> @@ -4934,6 +4959,21 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_event_header *header,
> data->stack_user_size = stack_size;
> header->size += size;
> }
> +
> + if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR) {
> + /* regs dump ABI info */
> + int size = sizeof(u64);
> +
> + perf_sample_regs_intr(&data->regs_intr, regs);
> +
> + if (data->regs_intr.regs) {
> + u64 mask = event->attr.sample_regs_intr;
> +
> + size += hweight64(mask) * sizeof(u64);
> + }
> +
> + header->size += size;
> + }
> }
>
> static void perf_event_output(struct perf_event *event,
> @@ -7134,6 +7174,8 @@ static int perf_copy_attr(struct perf_event_attr __user *uattr,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (attr->sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR)
> + ret = perf_reg_validate(attr->sample_regs_intr);
> out:
> return ret;
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists