[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhHMCCCSU7PbWdgPouefbLJBcoxR8nmsS8dg_=BcuqVJZbDew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:57:00 -0500
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
"open list:NETWORKING [IPv4/..." <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] netfilter: Replace smp_read_barrier_depends() with lockless_dereference()
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 10:06 -0500, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> Recently lockless_dereference() was added which can be used in place of
>> hard-coding smp_read_barrier_depends(). The following PATCH makes the change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
>> ---
>> net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c | 3 +--
>> net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c | 3 +--
>> net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c | 3 +--
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
>> index f95b6f9..fc7533d 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
>> @@ -270,12 +270,11 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>
>> local_bh_disable();
>> addend = xt_write_recseq_begin();
>> - private = table->private;
>> /*
>> * Ensure we load private-> members after we've fetched the base
>> * pointer.
>> */
>> - smp_read_barrier_depends();
>> + private = lockless_dereference(table->private);
>> table_base = private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
>>
>
>
> Please carefully read the code, before and after your change, then
> you'll see this change broke the code.
>
> Problem is that a bug like that can be really hard to diagnose and fix
> later, so really you have to be very careful doing these mechanical
> changes.
>
> IMO, current code+comment is better than with this
> lockless_dereference() which in this particular case obfuscates the
> code. more than anything.
>
> In this case we do have a lock (sort of), so lockless_dereference() is
> quite misleading.
>
Hi Eric,
Thanks for looking at this patch.
I've been scratching my head since morning trying to find out what was
so obviously wrong with this patch. Alas, I don't see what you do.
Could you point it out and show me how incompetent I am, please?
Thanks!
--
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists