[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54708B5E.2080302@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:10:54 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86: AMD-perf_event: Deletion of unnecessary checks before
the function call "free_percpu"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:01:27 +0100
The free_percpu() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
index 30790d7..4856232 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
@@ -592,11 +592,9 @@ fail_online:
fail_l2:
if (cpu_has_perfctr_nb)
perf_pmu_unregister(&amd_nb_pmu);
- if (amd_uncore_l2)
- free_percpu(amd_uncore_l2);
+ free_percpu(amd_uncore_l2);
fail_nb:
- if (amd_uncore_nb)
- free_percpu(amd_uncore_nb);
+ free_percpu(amd_uncore_nb);
fail_nodev:
return ret;
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists