[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141123174604.GA4054@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:46:04 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: task_stat splat
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:22:56PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Could you identify somehow the line which matches
> task_sched_runtime+0x99 ? Probably do_task_delta_exec()...
See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141675498417759&w=2
Chris triggers the same splat and reverting
6e998916dfe3 ("sched/cputime: Fix clock_nanosleep()/clock_gettime() inconsistency")
fixes the issue for him. I'm testing that same thing reverted too, first
resume cycle looks good.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists