linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] i2c: omap: implement workaround for handling invalid BB-bit values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141123044306.GA19898@saruman>
Date:	Sat, 22 Nov 2014 22:43:06 -0600
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC:	Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] i2c: omap: implement workaround for handling invalid
 BB-bit values

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 07:02:22PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 05:06:10PM +0300, Alexander Kochetkov wrote:
> > 
> > 22 нояб. 2014 г., в 16:23, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> написал(а):
> > 
> > > Huh, I can't apply this one? Which kernel version is this based on?
> > 
> > v.3.13-rc8
> 
> Wow, that's old. Can you please rebase the series on top of 3.18-rc4? Or
> my i2c/for-next? Or at the very least 3.17?
> 
> @Felipe: With which kernel did you test the series? Also, 3.13?

maybe there was a typo? I tested on v3.18-rc3 :-)


-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)