[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141123185200.GD4431@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:52:00 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c: slave-eeprom: add eeprom simulator driver
Hallo Wolfram,
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > + case I2C_SLAVE_REQ_READ_END:
> > > > + eeprom->buffer_idx++;
> > > You don't check here for buffer_idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(buffer)?
> > > Ditto in the I2C_SLAVE_REQ_WRITE_END case.
> > I just noticed that buffer_idx is an u8, so it overflows at 255+1. So
> > the probe routine should error out if size is bigger than 256.
>
> But size is currently fixed to 256, so all is fine. Yes, if we extend it
> for bigger sizes, all that stuff needs to be taken care of, right.
yeah, it's well hidden, but true. So IMHO worth a comment.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists