[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1416756022.6651.45.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 07:20:22 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: thunderbolt: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function
call "ring_free"
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 15:14 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> 2. Are any additional prefixes appropriate so that further name space
> >> conflicts can be better avoided?
> >
> > To avoid possible external naming conflicts, add tb_ prefix to
> > various ring_<foo> structs and functions.
>
> Do you imagine that any XEN software developers need also to reconsider
> this implementation detail?
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c?id=fc14f9c1272f62c3e8d01300f52467c0d9af50f9#n268
I think static functions can be named whatever
the developer chooses.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists